TLDR:
- Tristero Research warns that tokenized real-world assets like loans and real estate create a hidden liquidity paradox.
- Illiquid assets wrapped in liquid tokens may fuel sudden sell-offs, risking contagion across crypto markets in minutes.
- The report compares tokenized credit risks to the 2008 subprime collapse but with blockchain speed amplifying volatility.
- Structured “RWA-squared” products could worsen systemic fragility without stronger oracles, collateral rules, and safeguards.
The tokenization of real-world assets is gathering speed, drawing in big banks, funds, and crypto protocols. Investors see it as a bridge between traditional finance and blockchain.
Traded tokens representing property, credit, and commodities are marketed as liquid, transparent, and always available. Yet, researchers now say this setup hides a dangerous paradox. What looks like progress could, under stress, unravel into a fast-moving market crash.
RWA Tokenization Creates Liquidity Paradox
According to a new report from Tristero Research titled When Slow Assets Meet Fast Markets, the tokenization of real-world assets is creating what it calls a “liquidity paradox.”
The study, cited by Wu Blockchain, explained that loans, real estate, and commodities remain fundamentally slow-moving. However, when these are placed on blockchain rails, their tokens trade instantly on decentralized markets.
The risk, Tristero said, comes from the mismatch between how these assets behave off-chain and how quickly their tokens move on-chain.
A default or a price change in real life may unfold slowly, but the token representing it can collapse in minutes once markets react. That collapse could trigger automated liquidations across lending platforms and wipe out liquidity pools.
The report compared this setup to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008. Back then, illiquid mortgages were wrapped into complex securities that seemed liquid, only to collapse under pressure. The same logic, the researchers warned, now applies to tokenized assets, with the difference that blockchain speeds amplify contagion dramatically.
Tristero Research warns that tokenizing RWAs like loans, real estate, and commodities creates a “liquidity paradox.” While packaged as 24/7 tradable tokens, these slow, illiquid assets could amplify risks in crises—defaults and valuation shifts might trigger rapid liquidations…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) September 5, 2025
On-Chain Credit and Price Risks Under Stress
Tristero described several scenarios where problems could spread. In one case, a pool of tokenized small-business loans could see defaults rise.
If oracles update slowly, markets might sell ahead of the real numbers, sparking a cascade of automated liquidations. What begins as a slow credit squeeze in the real world turns into a rapid market crash on-chain.
In another scenario, real estate tokens collapse after doubts surface about custodianship or property claims. A legal process to settle disputes may take months, but decentralized markets would react in hours, draining liquidity and leaving protocols with unrecoverable losses.
The research also warned about “RWA-squared” products. These include structured products, indices, and synthetics built on top of tokenized assets. While marketed as safer or more diverse, they may instead multiply fragility.
Correlations could converge around the blockchain layer itself, meaning that if oracles or collateral parameters fail, every derivative linked to them could fall together.
Tristero concluded that stronger safeguards are essential. That includes stricter collateral rules, more frequent oracle updates, and circuit breakers to slow contagion. The report cautioned that without such steps, tokenized real-world assets could transform a slow-moving financial problem into a rapid on-chain crisis.
