TLDR
- Swiss gambling authority Gespa has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA over its NFT platform.
- The complaint alleges that FIFA’s NFT competitions may qualify as unlicensed gambling under Swiss law.
- Gespa claims that users must pay to participate in challenges with the chance to win valuable digital assets.
- FIFA recently moved its NFT operations to the Avalanche blockchain which may have introduced more lottery-like mechanics.
- Gespa stated it only discovered the platform recently and offered to assist authorities but will not lead any prosecution.
The Swiss gambling regulator, Gespa, has filed a criminal complaint against FIFA regarding its NFT rewards platform. The regulator claims that FIFA’s NFT-linked competitions may breach gambling laws due to monetary stakes and potential winnings. Although non-binding, the complaint marks a serious legal development for FIFA’s digital ventures.
Gespa Alleges FIFA’s NFT Platform Breaks Swiss Law
Gespa submitted a one-page criminal complaint to Swiss authorities concerning FIFA’s NFT distribution model. It stated that FIFA offers competitions involving monetary stakes and prize-based outcomes. According to Gespa, this could meet the legal criteria for gambling.
The platform allows users to enter challenges or await random NFT drops, hoping to win valuable digital collectibles. FIFA switched its blockchain partner from Algorand to Avalanche, increasing activity and possibly introducing more lottery-like features. Gespa claims this new structure further blurs the line between digital collectibles and gambling.
“Various competitions related to [NFT] collectibles are offered,” Gespa wrote, citing the monetary stakes and reward system in place. Gespa also highlighted that entry into these competitions requires payment. Thus, it views them as either lotteries or forms of sports betting under Swiss gambling law.
Regulatory Action Remains Uncertain Despite Formal Complaint
While Gespa filed the complaint, it does not plan to lead any criminal prosecution itself. The agency noted that only law enforcement can determine whether FIFA’s NFT model violates Swiss law. Gespa offered cooperation but made it clear that it would not pursue charges directly.
The regulator claims it discovered FIFA’s NFT offerings only recently, despite the platform operating for years. Gespa’s fast response after this discovery signals growing concern over blockchain-linked games. However, its complaint remains brief and does not conclude on FIFA’s legal liability.
Gespa emphasized that it holds no official legal stance and simply flagged a potential legal issue. “Participation is only possible in exchange for a monetary stake,” the complaint added, reinforcing its concern. Still, Gespa released no further information, leaving enforcement to Swiss prosecutors.
FIFA May Pursue a Settlement or Alter Distribution Methods
FIFA may avoid litigation by adjusting its distribution of NFTs to comply with Swiss gambling regulations. Authorities have not confirmed if they will proceed with the case. Therefore, FIFA still has a path to negotiate with regulators.
The complaint may prompt FIFA to reform its promotional methods and digital asset sales. This could include removing any elements resembling betting or chance-based rewards. However, no official response from FIFA has been released yet.
With FIFA’s NFT presence expanding on Avalanche, legal clarity remains crucial for future offerings. Authorities must determine whether the current structure constitutes gambling. Until then, FIFA will continue to face ongoing scrutiny over its blockchain initiatives.
