TLDR
- Star Xu publicly accused Changpeng Zhao of making false statements tied to past disputes at OKCoin.
- The conflict resurfaced after Zhao’s memoir prompted Xu to restate earlier allegations and claims.
- Zhao denied all accusations and said he had already addressed the claims during a public response in 2015.
- The disagreement expanded when Xu questioned Zhao’s marital status based on earlier legal documents.
- Both executives continued exchanging statements online without reaching any resolution.
A renewed dispute between crypto executives escalated as Star Xu publicly criticized Changpeng Zhao over past claims. Xu accused Zhao of making misleading statements tied to earlier business conflicts and personal matters. The exchange intensified after Zhao’s memoir revived allegations linked to events from more than a decade ago.
Changpeng Zhao Faces Renewed Claims Over Past Conduct
Star Xu reopened earlier accusations against Changpeng Zhao and referenced disputes during Zhao’s time at OKCoin. He stated that Zhao made misleading claims regarding a contract issue involving Roger Ver and past agreements. Xu said he had avoided revisiting the issue but felt compelled after Zhao’s book release.
He wrote, “I had no intention of revisiting these old issues involving CZ,” and explained his position clearly.
He also cited a video he claimed showed conflicting contract versions and inconsistencies in Zhao’s statements. Xu argued that the material supported his claim that Zhao misled the public during that dispute.
Zhao addressed the matter in his memoir and denied all allegations related to contract forgery. He wrote that Xu made claims “out of the blue” and said he responded publicly in 2015. Zhao added that he outlined problems he observed at OKCoin during that time to defend himself.
Public Exchanges Expand into Personal Disputes
The disagreement expanded as Xu raised questions about Zhao’s marital status based on earlier legal filings. He referred to a letter that described Zhao’s spouse as his wife and challenged him to provide proof. Xu said he would apologize if Zhao produced a divorce agreement signed by both parties.
Zhao responded that he is “officially divorced” and rejected the claims as irrelevant to the dispute. He proposed a $1 billion wager or any amount Xu preferred to verify the divorce status. Zhao added that legal representatives could confirm the agreement without publicly releasing documents.
Xu declined the wager and cited compliance requirements related to operating a regulated exchange. He instead asked whether Zhao’s stake in Binance had been separated legally after the divorce. Zhao dismissed the question and said his financial matters were private and unrelated to Xu’s claims.
The dispute followed earlier disagreements linked to market events in January and October. Xu previously attributed certain market movements to Binance-related dynamics, which Binance denied publicly. Zhao’s memoir release triggered the latest exchange, leading both figures to restate earlier positions.
Recent statements from both sides show no resolution as each maintains its claims publicly. Xu repeated that Zhao made false statements and used strong language to describe his position. Zhao continued to deny wrongdoing and challenged Xu’s claims through public responses and direct statements.



