Key Takeaways
- Cryptocurrency mining operations possess over 27 gigawatts of planned electrical capacity, positioning them advantageously for AI infrastructure expansion.
- According to Bernstein, mining firms have disclosed over $90 billion in AI-focused agreements spanning 3.7 gigawatts of capacity.
- Obtaining one gigawatt of electrical power in the United States requires up to 50 months, making miners’ established grid access extremely valuable.
- Bernstein assigned “outperform” ratings to IREN, Riot Platforms, CleanSpark, and Core Scientific, with several price targets suggesting potential gains approaching 100%.
- Mining companies with established AI partnerships command approximately twice the valuation of traditional Bitcoin miners, at roughly $6 million per planned megawatt.
Cryptocurrency mining operations are emerging as critical participants in the AI infrastructure ecosystem. According to a recent analysis from Bernstein, electrical power availability — rather than semiconductor supply — has become the primary limitation for AI data center construction. This dynamic positions Bitcoin mining companies exceptionally well.
Electricity Access Creates Major Constraints
Bernstein’s research indicates that obtaining one gigawatt of grid electricity in the United States requires a median timeframe of approximately 50 months. Even in jurisdictions favorable to data center projects, such as Texas, utility providers handle applications in groups, resulting in extended wait times.
This timeline presents significant challenges for AI enterprises seeking rapid expansion. Cryptocurrency miners, however, already operate grid-connected facilities with substantial power substations and established infrastructure.
This competitive advantage explains why Bernstein now characterizes mining facilities as “warm powered shells” — industrial properties equipped with land, electricity, and structures prepared for GPU deployment.
The analysis reveals that publicly listed cryptocurrency mining companies manage over 27 gigawatts of planned electrical capacity. Approximately 3.7 gigawatts of this total are currently linked to disclosed AI agreements valued at more than $90 billion.
Transformative Partnerships Driving Industry Change
IREN exemplifies this strategic transformation. The firm established a significant collaboration with Nvidia to implement up to 5 gigawatts of AI infrastructure utilizing Nvidia’s DSX AI Factory framework. This arrangement encompasses a 2 gigawatt facility in Sweetwater, Texas. Nvidia secured a five-year option to acquire up to 30 million IREN shares at $70 per share, alongside committing approximately $3.4 billion in GPU cloud expenditure over five years.
Riot Platforms finalized a decade-long, $311 million agreement with AMD. Beginning at 25 megawatts with potential expansion to 200 megawatts at Riot’s 700 megawatt Rockdale, Texas location.
Bernstein established a price objective of $100 for IREN, representing approximately 98% upside potential from current levels. CleanSpark received a $24 target, roughly 78% higher than present trading values.
Market Valuation Dynamics
Mining operations with active AI contracts command valuations around $6 million per planned megawatt of capacity. This represents approximately double the $3 million per megawatt valuation for miners lacking AI involvement.
For Core Scientific specifically, Bernstein calculates that 86% of target enterprise value derives from AI operations, with merely 14% attributed to cryptocurrency mining activities.
Neverthstanding this shift, Bernstein notes that mining companies collectively trade at approximately a 90% discount relative to established AI data center operators, indicating the market has yet to fully recognize their infrastructure value.
Bernstein assigns $3 billion in enterprise value to Riot’s planned 1 gigawatt Corsicana facility alone, despite the site not yet producing substantial revenue.
Potential Challenges
This strategic pivot carries inherent risks. Bernstein cautions that new AI facilities still encounter environmental assessments, community resistance, and regulatory approval delays. Mining companies that distance themselves too significantly from Bitcoin production could forfeit opportunities if cryptocurrency mining economics strengthen following future halving events.
Soluna Holdings documented a 58% increase in first-quarter revenue, primarily driven by data center hosting operations, demonstrating the financial benefits of this approach materializing currently.
Bernstein’s central thesis is clear: mining companies controlling affordable, flexible power resources are strategically positioned in the AI infrastructure competition, and market valuations are only beginning to reflect this reality.



