Key Takeaways
- The S&P 500 has completed its most impressive winning streak since 2023, yet market experts are flagging potential summer weakness.
- Historical data from Dow Jones Market Data shows the S&P 500 typically loses 2.8% between April and September during midterm election cycles.
- Crude oil prices climbing toward $110 per barrel and the 10-year Treasury yield reaching a 12-month peak of 4.61% are creating market headwinds.
- Semiconductor names including Sandisk, Micron, and AMD have experienced declines ranging from 9% to 14% across five trading sessions amid broader concerns.
- According to Deutsche Bank, a full market correction would require sustained oil shocks, contractionary economic indicators, or aggressive Federal Reserve policy tightening.
The S&P 500 has achieved eight consecutive weeks of positive returns — marking its strongest performance streak since 2023. Friday’s session concluded with all three major indices posting gains, extending the weekly winning pattern.
However, as we transition into June, market analysts are raising yellow flags. Historical patterns suggest that summer months during midterm election cycles have traditionally presented challenges for equity markets.
Data compiled by Dow Jones Market Data reveals that the S&P 500 typically experiences an average decline of 2.8% from late April through late September in years featuring midterm elections. Through May, the benchmark index has already climbed 3.7% this year.

Historical midterm summers have witnessed dramatic declines. The benchmark index plummeted over 25% in 1930, dropped nearly 30% in 1974, and tumbled 24% in 2002 — all during midterm cycles. Even when these extreme cases are excluded from the calculation, the average return for this period registers virtually zero, showing a minimal gain of just 0.006%.
The Cboe Volatility Index is currently trading at 16.7%. Charlie McElligott, a strategist at Nomura, has highlighted this level as notably elevated for a market experiencing such a robust upward trajectory, indicating potential underlying vulnerabilities.
Jeffrey Hirsch, who publishes the Stock Trader’s Almanac, explains that midterm election years typically redirect investor attention from corporate earnings toward political uncertainty. While he doesn’t anticipate a full bear market, he suggests the market may experience “sideways choppy” movement throughout the summer months.
Jay Hatfield from Infrastructure Capital Advisors highlights a cyclical seasonal trend: equity markets typically demonstrate strength during earnings reporting periods but show weakness in the intervals between them.
Crude Oil Surge and Yield Increases Compound Market Concerns
Meanwhile, international markets have experienced downward momentum over recent weeks due to escalating tensions involving Iran.
Brent crude oil has rallied near $110 per barrel, fueled by supply chain disruptions affecting the Strait of Hormuz. This surge is driving gasoline prices upward just as Memorial Day weekend travel approaches.
The 10-year US Treasury yield has advanced to a new 12-month high of 4.61%. Elevated yields enhance the attractiveness of fixed-income securities relative to equities while simultaneously increasing corporate financing costs.
The pairing of persistent inflation readings and climbing yields has triggered selling pressure within technology and semiconductor sectors. Sandisk and Micron have each declined approximately 14% over five consecutive sessions. AMD has retreated roughly 9% during the same timeframe.
Henry Allen, a strategist at Deutsche Bank, indicated that a significant market pullback would necessitate at least one of three catalysts: a prolonged oil price shock, definitively contractionary economic metrics, or aggressive interest rate increases from central banking authorities. He observed that while crude prices remain elevated, none of these conditions have clearly materialized.
Nevertheless, Hatfield suggested a potential positive scenario. Should Democrats secure the House while Republicans maintain Senate control, the resulting divided government could benefit markets. Historical evidence shows that legislative gridlock has generally supported equity valuations by minimizing the probability of substantial policy transformations.
“Gridlock is generally great for stocks,” Hatfield said.



