Executive Summary
- SpaceX plans to complete its initial public offering this week, seeking $75 billion in capital at a historic $1.75 trillion market capitalization
- The Starlink division boasts more than 10 million users with Ebitda margins exceeding 60%; Baron Capital forecasts 300 million subscribers within 12 years
- Major agreements with Anthropic and Alphabet secure approximately $26 billion annually in AI computing rental revenue
- A majority of surveyed investment professionals recommend avoiding immediate purchases due to anticipated volatility and the company’s pre-profitability phase
- Corporate governance structure raises red flags — Musk maintains complete control over all voting shares and board composition
The highly anticipated SpaceX initial public offering is scheduled to be priced before the end of this week. The aerospace manufacturer seeks to secure $75 billion in fresh capital, positioning the company at a $1.75 trillion enterprise value. If successful, this would shatter all previous IPO records.
The pending public debut has created considerable debate within the investment community. While some view it as an exceptional entry opportunity, the majority counsel patience.
Arguments Supporting Investment
The primary investment thesis revolves around Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite-based internet service. The division currently serves over 10 million paying customers while maintaining Ebitda profit margins surpassing 60%.
Ron Baron of Baron Capital anticipates the subscriber base will reach 15 million by late 2026, eventually expanding to 300 million customers by 2036. Such growth could deliver $500 billion in yearly revenue alongside $300 billion in Ebitda during the 2030s.
The company has diversified into artificial intelligence infrastructure as well. Recent contracts with Anthropic and Alphabet secure computing capacity rentals worth approximately $26 billion annually. According to ARK Invest’s analysis, this generates roughly $52 billion in revenue for SpaceX.
Musk has publicly outlined ambitions to expand AI computing capabilities one hundred-fold. Using current rate structures, that expansion could yield $2.6 trillion in AI rental income.
Supporting these projections is SpaceX’s dominance in orbital launches and ongoing Starship development. This fully reusable heavy-lift vehicle could slash orbital access costs from thousands of dollars per kilogram down to hundreds.
Skeptical Perspectives
Critics emphasize that these figures represent distant projections rather than current realities. Starship remains in development. The proposed AI satellite network hasn’t been validated at commercial scale.
Robert Johnson, a finance professor, noted the valuation “assumes all of its growth projections play out perfectly.” He advised typical investors to avoid the offering.
Andy VandenBerg referenced Truist research indicating major technology IPOs experience average maximum declines of 55% during their inaugural year. He predicts superior entry opportunities will emerge later.
Keith Fitz-Gerald cautioned that individual investors are “not prepared” for the institutional trading dynamics that characteristically follow prominent public listings.
Mike Serio highlighted Meta’s experience, which failed to exceed S&P 500 returns until over a decade following its public debut.
Corporate Control and IPO Mechanics
Governance concerns have achieved widespread consensus. The corporate framework grants Musk absolute authority over voting shares and board membership. Yumi Narita representing the New York City Comptroller’s Office described it as “unprecedentedly bad.”
Lockup provisions deviate from conventional IPO standards. Rather than a uniform 180-day restriction expiration, SpaceX implements staggered lockups partially linked to share price performance.
Barron’s analysts suggest SpaceX represents superior value at $90 per share compared to the anticipated IPO pricing of $135.
Among eight investment professionals polled by Business Insider, six indicated they would decline to purchase shares on the debut day.



