It has happened again, folks. Several cryptocurrency investors are probably looking at their savings right now and thinking, “What have I done?” as Japanese crypto exchange Zaif confirmed early this morning it was the victim of a hack that saw nearly 6,000 BTC disappear within minutes. That’s roughly $36 million in USD.

Zaif Exchange Hacked

Another Hack – It’s Nothing New

In an era of increased cyberthreats, attacks like these are nothing new. The cryptocurrency arena has constantly been the subject of criticism for what many experts cite as a lack of security towards customers’ private information and financial holdings. In addition, while cyberthefts occur quite often, they usually don’t exist on such a large scale.

The two biggest events that everyone likely thinks of when stories like these appear are Mt. Gox and Cooincheck, both of which are headquartered in Japan. Mt. Gox was the biggest exchange in the world at one point, but in early 2014, its reputation was permanently stained when over $400 million in BTC wound up missing. Four years later, reimbursements still have not been completed.

Japan – Time to Beef Up Security

In January of this year, Coincheck “beat” Mt. Gox’s record when over half-a-billion dollars in BTC was stolen by hackers. The event sparked Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) into action, and the body began requesting information from all crypto exchanges in the country to analyze and observe their safety practices and daily operations. Those that did not meet certain standards were ultimately forced into temporary shut downs to potentially amp up their security protocols.

At this stage, it’s becoming clearer than ever that Japan really needs to enter “desperation mode.” The world’s two largest crypto hacks took place on Japanese soil, and the hacking of Zaif shows that not enough has been done. For example, Zaif officials have released the following statement:

“It turned out some of the hot wallets were hacked by unauthorized access from the outside, and part of the virtual currency managed by us was illegally discharged.”



Old Technology Will Do You No Good

First off, why is any exchange using hot wallets anymore? Why aren’t funds consistently being placed into cold storage right off the bat? We have seen this time and time again. Hot wallets do not invoke the same level of security one finds through cold storage. Thus, they’re more vulnerable to malicious activity.

Second, if you find yourself stuck using a hot wallet for any reason, why not place limits on the amount of currency it can hold? The smaller the target, the less tempting it will be to those with malintent. Recently, Lightning Labs – a platform built to offer speedier bitcoin and Litecoin payments – redesigned its desktop app to allow for faster currency processing. The trouble is that the app is officially a hot wallet. Thus, the amount of money the wallet can hold is limited to 0.16 BTC. Is there any reason why this approach can’t be taken by other product systems?

We’re Sorry – Let Us Help

Either way, Tech Bureau Corp – the cryptocurrency firm that owns Zaif – says it’s taking the hack very seriously and wants nothing more than to ensure all affected customers receive the attention and service they deserve. The company has recently agreed to receive a five billion-dollar yen investment from JASDAQ-listed Fisco Ltd. in exchange for majority ownership. Executives say they are planning to use the money they receive – roughly $45 million in USD – to replace any stolen funds for clients.

However, representatives of Tech Bureau further state that the financial assistance would likely change granted the amount of money stolen changed at any time during their initial investigation.

Nick Marinoff

Posted by Nick Marinoff

Nick Marinoff has been covering cryptocurrency since 2014. He has served as a lead content writer and news editor for Money & Tech; a public relations writer for Game Credits, and a senior writer for both Bitcoinist and News BTC.


All content on Blockonomi.com is provided solely for informational purposes, and is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any security, product, service or investment. The opinions expressed in this Site do not constitute investment advice and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *